|
Research EthicsResearch models in the humanities are different from those of the hard sciences. Most researchers agree that the principles of the scientific method are worth implementing in all disciplines, but because of the difficulty of reproducing controlled experiments, they are much harder to apply to the humanities. While results of chemistry experiments (for example) are supposed to be reproducible and the results clear-cut, historical evidence (for another example) is often much more difficult to interpret. What's more, actual historical occurrences can not be reproduced on demand. As a result, the ethical codes of the sciences are not always applicable to the humanities. This does not mean that there are few ethics, of course. It just means that, once you get past the immediate hazards of Plagiarism, these ethics are less well defined. Compare the web sites of the American Psychological Association with that of the Modern Language Association. You will find the APA ethics code after not too much trouble, but you might have trouble finding one for the MLA. Some ethical problems in any field are:
Some other big ethical no-nos are:
For more ethics issues, look at the following sites:
There have been some very famous writers who have been accused of academic fraud: Martin Luther King, Jr., Samuel Taylor Coleridge, and the French literary critic Paul de Man are just a few. To Humanities 347 Pathfinders Homepage This page created by Christopher Ryland 25 August 2000. Last updated 25 August 2000. |
|
Copyright 2000: Margaret Parks Cowan |